Wednesday, July 26, 2017

If I were to improve sports ability . . .

If at this age, suppose I want to improve my sports ability of mine, what would I do?

1) I would believe in strength/fat=athleticism equation.
I would increase strength and reduce fat both at the same time. This will give me the most benefit. I believe it should peak my sports ability by about 66% or more.

2)I would believe in #PythaShastri Second max reps is half of first max reps.
I should know whether my strength is increasing. I will do two sets with a heavy dumbbells for all of my body. Suppose the first max rep is coming out to be 12; then, I will strive to go beyond 6 in my second max rep.

3)I would eat palm sized protein helping in every meal.

4)I would synchronize my breathing and my legs.(#PythaShastri method)
Be in a standing position. Breathe in. At the same time sway right leg in clockwise semi-circular arc from front to back. Breathe out. And at the same time sway right leg in anti-clockwise semi-circular arc from back to front.
Then do the same for other leg.
(The angles in a semi-circle is 90 degrees fundamentals are being used here.)

5)I would do squats more.

6) I would do heel raises.

7)I would do pranayama.

But I have become old. And I can do running only with my brain being conscious all the while.

Friday, July 21, 2017

Cartoons Improvement

These are the things I am doing to improve cartooning and caricatures.
In caricatures, I am learning to use pencils and erasers effectively.
Mandolin U Srinivas it is supposed to be. Forgive me for non resemblance.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Sleepless nights

Lou Darvas was so good in cartoons, that I get sleepless nights.
I never realised that my cartoons lacked actions. (Folds in clothes are my weaknesses).
How to deal with this? Grading?
One way is; if Lou Darvas was good, Ken Hultgren was better.
Other way is; Zimmerman was the most respected cartoonist in U S A.
But one has to take life this way.  You have to accept that there are geniuses in every field.
Bondage between men matters and this can give relief to pain.
And another thing is maybe the grading itself is wrong.
Most of the times, it is futile to try and improve. I cannot become Lou Darvas.

Saturday, July 15, 2017

#PythaShastri e series is thumb, gap, first finger, gap, middle finger, gap, ring finger, gap, small finger

#PythaShastri "e series is  thumb, gap, first finger, gap, middle finger, gap, ring finger, gap, small
1 0
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
How can you write gaps like this? In zeros? The answer is how can I write fingers like this. In ones.
So fingers are vertically represented. Gaps are horizontally represented.
e= 1+1/1!+1/2!+1/3!+1/4!+. . . . . . . .

#PythaShastri 4/5 - 3/4 = 1/5²+1/5³+1/5⁴+1/5⁵+ . . . . . . . . . . . .

#PythaShastri "4/5 - 3/4 = 1/5²+1/5³+1/5⁴+1/5⁵+ . . . . . . . . . . . ."
This was discovered when I was drawing a pentagon with my own methods. It is the Riemann zeta functions.
In fact, the simplest Riemann zeta function is folding the paper into two, then into four, then into eight and so on.
1/2-0/1 = 1/2²+1/2³+1/2⁴+1/2⁵+. . . . . . . . . .
This has given me a lot of insights. Into improvement. Exercising. Being Active. And has given me the second series of my life. The first was the e series.

Friday, July 14, 2017

#PythaShastri I believe 3,2 to 4, 5 is the right triangle. 2 to 4 is the process equal to seeing Pythagoras theorem

#PythaShastri "I believe 3,2 to 4, 5 is the right triangle. 2 to 4 is the process equal to seeing Pythagoras theorem". And 3,4,5 is the right triangle.
This is what I saw. I understand now. I knew earlier. I lost opportunities. I gained time. To realise this.
I believe 1,2,3,4,5,9,10 is the process for 2 to 4. 2,3,4,5,10 is fine. Doubling. 1 and 9? The tongue. It said 1,2,3,4,5,9,10. 1 and 9 extra. Well, the beauty is 1 and 9 leads to special theory of relativity. Which means if sand is considered in an hour glass, so should be the empty space. In other words you need to see 1 and 9.
Is it clear to you? Please comment.

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

#PythaShastri Count of primes by count of non-primes will lead to ten

"Count of primes by count of non-primes will lead to ten". #PythaShastri statement.
But does it matter? No. Mathematicians are not interested in these type of statements.
It may interest many and they may find the information useful. But then their voice dies. It is not able to reach to the higher levels. Result, this statement is considered blasphemous. Or a statement that involves unnecessary controversies.
But this statement is true to my beliefs. Because small prime by next larger prime actually results in decimal point. Like 2 / 3. So Larger prime by the next smaller prime should be 10. Something like 1007/97. And there is no prime between 97 and 1007.
I believe 1/2 is there. So there may be a mistake.