Khuda na khasta #PythaShastri fails.
There are expressions where it seems d/dn(n!)=e/pi. How to proceed? Your body! Your brain!
Logic.
There were pi squared terms to. But only e terms. No e squared.
So it means d/dn(n!)=e/pi and sometimes e/ (pi squared).
By these sort of interpretations and deductions it seems that
e^(i × theta) = cos(theta)+i× sin(theta).
Leonhard Euler it is.
There are expressions where it seems d/dn(n!)=e/pi. How to proceed? Your body! Your brain!
Logic.
There were pi squared terms to. But only e terms. No e squared.
So it means d/dn(n!)=e/pi and sometimes e/ (pi squared).
By these sort of interpretations and deductions it seems that
e^(i × theta) = cos(theta)+i× sin(theta).
Leonhard Euler it is.
Khuda na khasta means bhagwan na kare.
ReplyDeleteFor one I had
ReplyDelete1
10
100
1000
model for e.
Two
ReplyDeleteI had vision of 2,3,4,5 and 3,2,4,5 which is clock.
In 3,2,4,5 I have vision of 2 and 4 being together and 3 and 5 together.
Putting all these in a complex fashion we get e^(i×theta)= cos(theta)+i × sin(theta).
ReplyDeleteEspecially,product of n squared into n squared minus one term is interesting.
ReplyDeleteIn denominator it seems if n then pi.
If n squared then pi squared.
This seals as a euler expression case without doubt.
Only case is why denominator?
ReplyDeleteRiemann series sometimes called as Riemann euler series.
What to hide?
2,3,4,5 and 3,2,4,5 are damn important stuff. First is a rational. Second is a clock. Pi.
ReplyDeleteIn 3,2,4,5 I offer two statements.
ReplyDeleteOne 2 to 4 is the right triangle formation of 3, 4 and 5.
Two 2 and 4 are together and so should be 3 and 5. Cosines and sines in e^itheta.
Rational to above is complex?
ReplyDeleteI have doubts. I think it must be fourier.
I HAVE GOT IT MAN. I THINK SO !!
ReplyDeleteTHE GREATEST EVER SO FAR FOURIER HAS BEEN INTERNALISED. I THINK SO !!
YES. RATIONAL TO PI IS INDEED FOURIER.
ANY PERIODIC FUNCTION IN CIRCULAR. THAT'S WHAT IS FOURIER AND I GOT IT !!
Otherwise I have to eat my words.