Friday, July 14, 2017

#PythaShastri I believe 3,2 to 4, 5 is the right triangle. 2 to 4 is the process equal to seeing Pythagoras theorem

#PythaShastri "I believe 3,2 to 4, 5 is the right triangle. 2 to 4 is the process equal to seeing Pythagoras theorem". And 3,4,5 is the right triangle.
This is what I saw. I understand now. I knew earlier. I lost opportunities. I gained time. To realise this.
I believe 1,2,3,4,5,9,10 is the process for 2 to 4. 2,3,4,5,10 is fine. Doubling. 1 and 9? The tongue. It said 1,2,3,4,5,9,10. 1 and 9 extra. Well, the beauty is 1 and 9 leads to special theory of relativity. Which means if sand is considered in an hour glass, so should be the empty space. In other words you need to see 1 and 9.
Is it clear to you? Please comment.

7 comments:

  1. There's a lot of journey ahead.
    "The road to reality" is tough.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 3, 2 to 4, 5 is of complex numbers.
    1,2,3,4,5,9,10 is of complex numbers too.
    At least 2,3,4,5,10 is.
    1 and 9 are interesting. Is it relativity?
    Because tongue one day whispered to me very clearly 1,2,3,4,5,9,10.
    Possibly trustworthy in Islam.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What is a complex number?
    Arnold Carbajal in his technical paper says time can be substituted for i.
    This sure is enlightening.
    Time can be substituted for complex number.
    I have a way ahead now. "The road to reality" is not so dark ahead.
    I hope to throw some light.
    I wish I was under some great scientist like Prof. Narlikar. Ready made lessons would have been available. And I would have moved ahead confidently.
    Anyway thanks to Arnold Carbajal for enlightening.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So, it was Pythagoras law, i (complex number); Doubling, i squared and +1 (complex number); and the hour glass model (time) that was observed on one fateful day of my school life.
    I am realizing this now. Especially after time and complex number equivalence.
    I think body can realize time in many ways. A statement like, "Pyarelal melodies are same. But time has changed." Which means Pyarelal is leading a life of constants.
    When you are hungry, one will tend to eat carbs more. Rather than protein. This is also a way of realization of time.
    But, on that fateful day, possibly I experienced time in this way.
    This finishes this topic.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Complete number based explanation is not possible as movement is involved.
    We say two hands. Doubling. Music we go double. No movements. So far so fine. No movements. But music evolved.
    But then there is folding a paper into two. Movement. (Or cutting, killing lives; slapping women; raping; movement).
    What happens?. We see numbers. What numbers when we fold? 1,2,3,4,5. Obviously. Because half the paper is facing us. Then we are not confident. To exactly match. So we halve by going from 9 to 10. This is basically halving. But becomes two. 1,2,3,4,5,9,10.
    It is something like cell division. Or sex.
    So music is doubling without violence. But writing, talking (If you believe in me and tongue saying 1,2,3,4,5,9,10) may be violence. It may not be also. It is relativity.
    1 and 9. Relatively not confident.
    So 1,2,3,4,5,9,10 is a holy chant, possibly for us Indians.
    This finishes the implications of the topic.


    ReplyDelete
  6. Movement of eyes is possibly akin to music. Bollywood knows better. Relatively non-violent. 1 and 9.
    Guilt is some other issue. Here is now religion jumps in.
    China is very correct in saying Forget religion. They also say one child. But India never listened.
    We individually are only half of China standards. We usually do not double our work. Except sex. And China will ask Are you not guilty?
    This finishes extended implications of the topic.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I believe this experience of 3,2 to 4,5 and 1,2,3,4,5,9,10 is similar to Laplace transform.

    ReplyDelete