I feel these three ideas of mine are good and are of value to mathematicians globally.
Golden ratio with consecutive numbers
Relationship between 3 consecutive numbers and 4 consecutive numbers
Lord Vaidheeswara, kindly help me. You are omniscient, you know it all. Kindly do something for this ignorant being !!
The convergence test method seems to be working. But what about the value at convergence?
I learnt from Wikipedia the following formula.
As software is a present day reality, this formula is great.
Finally my search has come to an end. Thank you my Lord!! Last few years I was just mad with expressions. Now I feel relieved.
Well measuring behavior, becoming extroverted, Ramanujan, pentagon, constants, 3 consecutive numbers, 4 consecutive numbers and all for the last few years.
I shall do drawing with pencils ✏ more vigorously. This should be my focus now, I believe.
Have a great 👍 day, dear blog readers !!
I can draw a pentagon as 72 degrees too. This is because I have a theory on division of an angle into 5 parts. 90 degrees can be drawn. 60 degrees can be drawn. And 60+2/5(90-60)=72 can also be.
I present the following expression today. This expression combines the differential, sigma and integral of mathematics. It was my desire to make a fabulous equation and this equation fulfills my desire.
Have a great day, dear blog readers !!
(Kindly point out if there is an error in this expression)
I am hereby presenting a binomial expression.
Try the below given pi expressions.
The rational number series which are essentially n(n+1) in the denominator is important. Then there is another function and that is (2n-1)(2n+1) in the denominator.
I decided to mix these two things up. Instead of (2n-1)(2n+1) in the denominator, I used (n-1)(n+1) in the denominator.
I got one expression with above. Then I re-arranged and got two more. So totally three expressions I tried. Using Wolfram Alpha.
The expressions are given below.
Amazingly great looking beauties. There is one approximation expression too!! And that is sone pe suhaga !!
Have a very great day, my dear blog readers !!
I think I can overtake Ramanujan in the number of equations made. Of course not the quality. But quantity I can. And if Ramanujan were alive, he would have been proud of me. JRMS quite rightly rejected my paper for quality. They were correct. I only request and beg them to consider my equations unofficially. Why deny the aspirants of mathematics a learning? I hope they will be magnanimous to consider my suggestion.
Here are some more.
