People below 30 years. And kids especially. The method written in this blog post has errors. However, the traditional bisecting of angles technique taught in schools have no errors. This is more of an engineering approach. I can make it more accurate by positioning the arc backward depending on the extent of error. Again an engineering approach. So cool it kids. And take this lightly !!
Bisection is not a problem. Whether chords or arc. Right? So we have chord length and arc length in a bisected angle. Right? We need to find a formula now on trisection, 4-section, 5-section etc. now that we know the arc length and chord length of bisected angle. Right?
People below 30 years. And kids especially.
ReplyDeleteThe method written in this blog post has errors. However, the traditional bisecting of angles technique taught in schools have no errors.
This is more of an engineering approach.
I can make it more accurate by positioning the arc backward depending on the extent of error. Again an engineering approach.
So cool it kids. And take this lightly !!
What if we draw chords CG, DH etc. And use AB on them. Is this correct then ?
ReplyDeleteIf chord is bisected, then is the corresponding arc bisected?
Bisection is not a problem. Whether chords or arc. Right?
ReplyDeleteSo we have chord length and arc length in a bisected angle. Right?
We need to find a formula now on trisection, 4-section, 5-section etc. now that we know the arc length and chord length of bisected angle. Right?
There is feasibility in this method. I am confident of formulating a method on the basis of approximation.
ReplyDeleteUsing iteration one can finally trisect,4-sect, 5-sect or 6-sect an angle.
ReplyDelete