This is to represent folds in clothes.
This was the last challenge in cartoons.
I have conquered this challenge in my own way.
How is this idea?
I mean, how much percent is it effective vis a vis folds in clothes.
Sunday, July 30, 2017
Alternate Lines
This is to represent folds in clothes.
This was the last challenge in cartoons.
I have conquered this challenge in my own way.
How is this idea?
I mean, how much percent is it effective vis a vis folds in clothes.
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
If I were to improve sports ability . . .
If at this age, suppose I want to improve my sports ability of mine, what would I do?
1) I would believe in strength/fat=athleticism equation.
I would increase strength and reduce fat both at the same time. This will give me the most benefit. I believe it should peak my sports ability by about 66% or more.
2)I would believe in #PythaShastri Second max reps is half of first max reps.
I should know whether my strength is increasing. I will do two sets with a heavy dumbbells for all of my body. Suppose the first max rep is coming out to be 12; then, I will strive to go beyond 6 in my second max rep.
3)I would eat palm sized protein helping in every meal.
4)I would synchronize my breathing and my legs.(#PythaShastri method)
Be in a standing position. Breathe in. At the same time sway right leg in clockwise semi-circular arc from front to back. Breathe out. And at the same time sway right leg in anti-clockwise semi-circular arc from back to front.
Then do the same for other leg.
(The angles in a semi-circle is 90 degrees fundamentals are being used here.)
5)I would do squats more.
6) I would do heel raises.
7)I would do pranayama.
But I have become old. And I can do running only with my brain being conscious all the while.
1) I would believe in strength/fat=athleticism equation.
I would increase strength and reduce fat both at the same time. This will give me the most benefit. I believe it should peak my sports ability by about 66% or more.
2)I would believe in #PythaShastri Second max reps is half of first max reps.
I should know whether my strength is increasing. I will do two sets with a heavy dumbbells for all of my body. Suppose the first max rep is coming out to be 12; then, I will strive to go beyond 6 in my second max rep.
3)I would eat palm sized protein helping in every meal.
4)I would synchronize my breathing and my legs.(#PythaShastri method)
Be in a standing position. Breathe in. At the same time sway right leg in clockwise semi-circular arc from front to back. Breathe out. And at the same time sway right leg in anti-clockwise semi-circular arc from back to front.
Then do the same for other leg.
(The angles in a semi-circle is 90 degrees fundamentals are being used here.)
5)I would do squats more.
6) I would do heel raises.
7)I would do pranayama.
But I have become old. And I can do running only with my brain being conscious all the while.
Friday, July 21, 2017
Cartoons Improvement
In caricatures, I am learning to use pencils and erasers effectively.
Mandolin U Srinivas it is supposed to be. Forgive me for non resemblance.
Sunday, July 16, 2017
Sleepless nights
Lou Darvas was so good in cartoons, that I get sleepless nights.
I never realised that my cartoons lacked actions. (Folds in clothes are my weaknesses).
How to deal with this? Grading?
One way is; if Lou Darvas was good, Ken Hultgren was better.
Other way is; Zimmerman was the most respected cartoonist in U S A.
But one has to take life this way. You have to accept that there are geniuses in every field.
Bondage between men matters and this can give relief to pain.
And another thing is maybe the grading itself is wrong.
Most of the times, it is futile to try and improve. I cannot become Lou Darvas.
I never realised that my cartoons lacked actions. (Folds in clothes are my weaknesses).
How to deal with this? Grading?
One way is; if Lou Darvas was good, Ken Hultgren was better.
Other way is; Zimmerman was the most respected cartoonist in U S A.
But one has to take life this way. You have to accept that there are geniuses in every field.
Bondage between men matters and this can give relief to pain.
And another thing is maybe the grading itself is wrong.
Most of the times, it is futile to try and improve. I cannot become Lou Darvas.
Saturday, July 15, 2017
#PythaShastri e series is thumb, gap, first finger, gap, middle finger, gap, ring finger, gap, small finger
#PythaShastri "e series is thumb, gap, first finger, gap, middle finger, gap, ring finger, gap, small
finger"
Or
1
1 0
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
How can you write gaps like this? In zeros? The answer is how can I write fingers like this. In ones.
So fingers are vertically represented. Gaps are horizontally represented.
So,
e= 1+1/1!+1/2!+1/3!+1/4!+. . . . . . . .
finger"
Or
1
1 0
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
How can you write gaps like this? In zeros? The answer is how can I write fingers like this. In ones.
So fingers are vertically represented. Gaps are horizontally represented.
So,
e= 1+1/1!+1/2!+1/3!+1/4!+. . . . . . . .
#PythaShastri 4/5 - 3/4 = 1/5²+1/5³+1/5⁴+1/5⁵+ . . . . . . . . . . . .
#PythaShastri "4/5 - 3/4 = 1/5²+1/5³+1/5⁴+1/5⁵+ . . . . . . . . . . . ."
This was discovered when I was drawing a pentagon with my own methods. It is the Riemann zeta functions.
In fact, the simplest Riemann zeta function is folding the paper into two, then into four, then into eight and so on.
1/2-0/1 = 1/2²+1/2³+1/2⁴+1/2⁵+. . . . . . . . . .
This has given me a lot of insights. Into improvement. Exercising. Being Active. And has given me the second series of my life. The first was the e series.
This was discovered when I was drawing a pentagon with my own methods. It is the Riemann zeta functions.
In fact, the simplest Riemann zeta function is folding the paper into two, then into four, then into eight and so on.
1/2-0/1 = 1/2²+1/2³+1/2⁴+1/2⁵+. . . . . . . . . .
This has given me a lot of insights. Into improvement. Exercising. Being Active. And has given me the second series of my life. The first was the e series.
Friday, July 14, 2017
#PythaShastri I believe 3,2 to 4, 5 is the right triangle. 2 to 4 is the process equal to seeing Pythagoras theorem
#PythaShastri "I believe 3,2 to 4, 5 is the right triangle. 2 to 4 is the process equal to seeing Pythagoras theorem". And 3,4,5 is the right triangle.
This is what I saw. I understand now. I knew earlier. I lost opportunities. I gained time. To realise this.
I believe 1,2,3,4,5,9,10 is the process for 2 to 4. 2,3,4,5,10 is fine. Doubling. 1 and 9? The tongue. It said 1,2,3,4,5,9,10. 1 and 9 extra. Well, the beauty is 1 and 9 leads to special theory of relativity. Which means if sand is considered in an hour glass, so should be the empty space. In other words you need to see 1 and 9.
Is it clear to you? Please comment.
This is what I saw. I understand now. I knew earlier. I lost opportunities. I gained time. To realise this.
I believe 1,2,3,4,5,9,10 is the process for 2 to 4. 2,3,4,5,10 is fine. Doubling. 1 and 9? The tongue. It said 1,2,3,4,5,9,10. 1 and 9 extra. Well, the beauty is 1 and 9 leads to special theory of relativity. Which means if sand is considered in an hour glass, so should be the empty space. In other words you need to see 1 and 9.
Is it clear to you? Please comment.
Tuesday, July 11, 2017
#PythaShastri Count of primes by count of non-primes will lead to ten
"Count of primes by count of non-primes will lead to ten". #PythaShastri statement.
But does it matter? No. Mathematicians are not interested in these type of statements.
It may interest many and they may find the information useful. But then their voice dies. It is not able to reach to the higher levels. Result, this statement is considered blasphemous. Or a statement that involves unnecessary controversies.
But this statement is true to my beliefs. Because small prime by next larger prime actually results in decimal point. Like 2 / 3. So Larger prime by the next smaller prime should be 10. Something like 1007/97. And there is no prime between 97 and 1007.
I believe 1/2 is there. So there may be a mistake.
But does it matter? No. Mathematicians are not interested in these type of statements.
It may interest many and they may find the information useful. But then their voice dies. It is not able to reach to the higher levels. Result, this statement is considered blasphemous. Or a statement that involves unnecessary controversies.
But this statement is true to my beliefs. Because small prime by next larger prime actually results in decimal point. Like 2 / 3. So Larger prime by the next smaller prime should be 10. Something like 1007/97. And there is no prime between 97 and 1007.
I believe 1/2 is there. So there may be a mistake.
#PythaShastri Second max.reps. is always half of first max. reps.
"Second max. reps. is always half of first max. reps" #PythaShastri statement.
But does it matter? No. Because max. reps is never an objective of a bodybuilder. 11 is usually.
It may interest many and they may find it an useful piece of information. But then their voice dies. It is not able to reach to the higher levels. Result, this statement is considered blasphemous. Or a statement that involves foreign element.
But I am sure that this statement will be useful to normal working ladies who have a 2.5 kg pair dumbbells. It will be useful if they comment on the statement. The #PythaShastri statement.
Is #PythaShastri true? Can I claim?
I believe so. I saw 3,4,5 right triangle in school days. And it is driving me. DTEA Lodi Estate school.
But does it matter? No. Because max. reps is never an objective of a bodybuilder. 11 is usually.
It may interest many and they may find it an useful piece of information. But then their voice dies. It is not able to reach to the higher levels. Result, this statement is considered blasphemous. Or a statement that involves foreign element.
But I am sure that this statement will be useful to normal working ladies who have a 2.5 kg pair dumbbells. It will be useful if they comment on the statement. The #PythaShastri statement.
Is #PythaShastri true? Can I claim?
I believe so. I saw 3,4,5 right triangle in school days. And it is driving me. DTEA Lodi Estate school.
Wednesday, July 5, 2017
Workouts these days
I do the following workout schedule. One round. With 10 kg pair dumbbells.
1. Dead Lifts. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
2. Abs swings. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
3. Goblet Squats. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
4.Military Press. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
5.Biceps curls. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
6.Triceps back lifts. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
7.Chest Press. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
8.Heel Raises. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
9.Back rows. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
10.Leg lunges. 30 seconds.
Complan and protinex for nutrition. Interval Timer App for timing.
At peak, I have done the above schedule thrice. I wanted to do four times which would have put me in top league of strength and fitness. I believe 5 times would be pro level.
At peak, I have done one round in the mornings and one round in the evenings for 15 days. 66 days it is to be considered a regular. In exercises. Continual workout done for about 150 days. 53 percent healthy.
1. Dead Lifts. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
2. Abs swings. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
3. Goblet Squats. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
4.Military Press. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
5.Biceps curls. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
6.Triceps back lifts. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
7.Chest Press. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
8.Heel Raises. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
9.Back rows. 30 seconds.
Rest for 15 seconds.
10.Leg lunges. 30 seconds.
Complan and protinex for nutrition. Interval Timer App for timing.
At peak, I have done the above schedule thrice. I wanted to do four times which would have put me in top league of strength and fitness. I believe 5 times would be pro level.
At peak, I have done one round in the mornings and one round in the evenings for 15 days. 66 days it is to be considered a regular. In exercises. Continual workout done for about 150 days. 53 percent healthy.