Tuesday, January 4, 2022

Focusing my stand

I am all about 1, x, x squared,  x cubed . . .

See this

And so is 1, i, i squared,  i cubed . . .

But there is confusion in air. I don't know how to clarify the confusion.  

I talked of antonyms. 

But I talked of verbal talks too. A bag of wheat being given away is negated from total bag of cereal. While a bag of wheat received is added to the total bag of cereals. 

So antonyms are not the problem. 

My view is Rational number corrects antonyms. 

Yes, 1 to 2 is not same as 2 to 3.

But that is what is Euler-Mascheroni constant all about. 

Hope the clarification was helpful. 😊 🫂 🙏 



at

8 comments:

  1. Kirtivasan GanesanJanuary 4, 2022 at 3:11 PM

    There is no meaning to use 1 by n to get Euler-Mascheroni constant gamma.
    Because gamma explains the basics of anamoly of our number system.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kirtivasan GanesanJanuary 4, 2022 at 3:26 PM

      I am talking of Ramanujan. Ramanujan summation of 1 by n.
      I shall try to make a separate blog post. My competence however is not enough.

      Delete
    2. Kirtivasan GanesanJanuary 4, 2022 at 4:11 PM

      I am interested in convergence. Not divergence.
      See convergence test

      Delete
    3. Kirtivasan GanesanJanuary 4, 2022 at 4:17 PM

      I wish to stress the importance of my convergence test.
      It is of triangles.
      I bet 75 percent for it.

      Delete
    4. Kirtivasan GanesanJanuary 4, 2022 at 4:18 PM

      Ramanujan summation may utilize my convergence test (based on triangles).
      Let them argue against it.

      Delete
  2. Kirtivasan GanesanJanuary 4, 2022 at 3:13 PM

    Let's focus our brains on prime numbers.
    The world is ahead of us.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kirtivasan GanesanJanuary 4, 2022 at 3:14 PM

    Basically I wish to focus on prime numbers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kirtivasan GanesanJanuary 4, 2022 at 3:15 PM

    This finishes our discussion on numbers. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete