where we went wrong

 There were three options we had when we decided to make India an educated nation.

1. Take out a ruler, a lens, a thermometer or any measuring device and explore the external world.

2. Be in a meditative state realize the field inside and learn adaptive and learning skills.

3. Hop between external and internal world with a sway in mind and use imagination.

We failed because we followed the third. "If only we gave permission to manufacture motorbikes only in India; our petrol bills would have come down by third". The ifs and buts mentality grew up. The argumentative Indian was born. An Indian who thought he understood the problem and got into depression because his solution was not accepted.

I tried to popularize the second from 2010 onwards.

I cannot but stress more the importance of following my suggestions. There are no consultants coming from the west. There are no help guaranteed from the oil lobby. Those days of pre 2000 are gone. 

If the learned community of India are apprehensive of my methods, no problem. At least teach the guys PDCA, SWOT and OODA cycles. Plan, Do, Check and Act. Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats. Observe, Orient, Decide and Act.

May better times arrive. I am waiting for Modi 3.0.

Good wishes.

food habits

The following is the most general habit when it comes to eating.

I am a vegetarian. I feel the opposite is true for me. Eat breakfast like a pauper, lunch like a prince and dinner like a king. Probably this is true for all vegans.

My point is there is so much of variance when it comes to just eating. What is + for some is - for other. And there are so many difference of opinions when it comes to other aspects of human life. My aim is to quantify this factor and put the +/- 0.5 to the human range.

That is what is my earlier expression is about.

my final statement 4

This is my final statement to the crude 2n! blog post that I made a few days back.

Hope you like this expression.

Have a nice day !!

my final statement 3

I have been using only my smartphone calculator for checking.  I did not try Wolfram alpha as I am unable to align with mathematical thoughts of Taylor series; when it comes to factorial of mine which I believe is of constant Pi.

I feel one can use consecutive numbers, halving and logarithms to base 10. In this factorial of mine.

I suggest macro adjustment and micro adjustment thereafter.

Macro adjustment for factorial of positive integers. 

Macro adjustment for factorial of numbers from 1 to 0. 

Micro adjustment. 

What about you guys? Did you try my crude 2n factorial formula? What are your ideas?

Do comments below. 

Have a nice day and happy Eid.

my final statement 2

 This one below is my final statement. This one is checked to a value of n from 1 to up to a million.

This formula is hardly anywhere near James Stirling formula. Stirling's approximate formula is far superior and far better than this.

Stirling's formula is an approximate formula. It gives n! approximately for decimal and huge huge numbers.

For accurate value of n! for decimal and positive integers use integral functions of e or integral functions of log.

Have a nice day !!

To get accurate information expression like below may be used . These values may be multiplied with n and 8 * pi may be subtracted. The value thus obtained may be raised to 1.0247. This is the required factor for this problem. 

Hope the matter is clear and complete from my side. Thanks 😊 🙏 .

Required range is hereby obtained.

And two simple calculations are also done.

This finishes the work in this topic.

my final statement

 My final say in the 2n! formula.

There are no proofs. 

But it has been observed. In the range online and smartphone calculator allows.

Hope you guys are enjoying the Sunday. Relax. And be prepared for a new week thereafter. The next week will have Eid. Now is the time of fasting for Muslims.

Have a nice time !!

my life in Ranchi

 

I wear company uniform.  Though it is not completely compulsory. 

My life is in township of SAIL Ranchi units. I have a Maruti Ignis car. I go to office before 9am. Then come back to residence in township for lunch after 1 pm. Then leave for office before 2 pm after a power nap.  I then leave office after 0530 pm and reach home. That's my day.

I have accountability.  Jamshedpur relationships. 

I am religious.  I try to follow my father's guidelines all the while.

gravity needed

 Newton explained it all. He made contributions which are super-human to say the least. 

Most of the mathematical equations we learnt work due to gravity. (My view.). The sine, cos, e, log. This is how I understand. Because if there is no gravity, then how can a building stand. If a building cannot stand then where is sine. 

However, pi is independent of gravity. (Again as I see it).

The n! factorial moves with e function or log function. And is calculated by integral e function and integral log functions. This calculation of n! is due to gravity. You may observe that the calculations due to n/(n+1)! is due to lifting weights. Lifting weights in gravity. Therefore the n! works there.

Now in my earlier post I gave the formula of n!. It is due to pi. And pi is non gravitational. Therefore, it cannot be expected that n! using the formula in my earlier post will strictly match the n! due to e and log and my earlier sigma function which are of gravity.

I hope I have not messed up things. I hope I am able to say my points clearly. And convey easily.

This is how I understand. If you find something wrong here, do convey in blog comments below.

Have a nice day !!

crude formula for 2n!

 

The formula is not exact. It is not even approximate. I want assistance from my blog readers to make it approximate. I also want my blog readers to try for less than 1 and greater than 0 factorials.

This formula is important. This is because the formula is correct only at n =pi near abouts.

The formula is correct when n = 3.06 and 2n is considered 6.2895. Below this value n has to be decreased to get 2n!. And above this value n has to be increased to get 2n! value. I am talking of positive integers.

Then this formula has to be corrected for 1 to 0 numbers.

There are 3 or 4 things to do to use the above factor. But as this is of pi, I will try in the coming days. 

You may also try as pi is nature constant.

Have a nice day !!

approximate n!

 

I came very near. But then this formula escaped my grasp. I was mad with the formulation of n!. I am now relieved that this formula was done. In history by James Stirling.

Have a nice day !!