If only one could divide AP part and GP part of AGP separately and then consider the factorial; the equation can be correct. The expression is not wrong. I am an expert in gamma function to say this. Well if software programmers can do step by step; why can't I do step by step in an area I am an expert?
What do I mean? If there were a BODMAS rule that (AP1!/AP2!) was allowed and (GP1/GP2)! was allowed for both numerator(decreasing progression) and denominator (increasing progression); then I can make an expression for gamma. I hope you have understood. I want (GP1/GP2)! and not (GP1!/GP2!). Moreover something like (1/3)! should be considered 1/(3!). Is there a BODMAS rule?
3 comments:
I am afraid there is an error in the above statement.
If only one could divide AP part and GP part of AGP separately and then consider the factorial; the equation can be correct.
The expression is not wrong. I am an expert in gamma function to say this.
Well if software programmers can do step by step; why can't I do step by step in an area I am an expert?
What do I mean?
If there were a BODMAS rule that (AP1!/AP2!) was allowed and (GP1/GP2)! was allowed for both numerator(decreasing progression) and denominator (increasing progression); then I can make an expression for gamma.
I hope you have understood. I want (GP1/GP2)! and not (GP1!/GP2!). Moreover something like (1/3)! should be considered 1/(3!).
Is there a BODMAS rule?
Post a Comment