Friday, May 22, 2020

Support needed

Agm of #PythaShastri methods result in approx values of constants.
Doubling is nature. How to use them?
Doubling numbers will double agm. What's the big deal may be said.
But you need #PythaShastri to treat doubling.
Mathematicians, you support me. I will use doubling. And together we can attempt constant values closer to actuals. 
What do you say?
(I tried working on #PythaShastri mantras, agm and doubling. Today i.e. 2020/05/23. My mathematical sense tells me that the result moved towards more precision. I tried on pi and G. I did not try golden ratio.)
(I tried working on the #PythaShastri mantra 1,2,3,7,9 and agm amd doubling and trebling. Today i.e. 2020/05/27. Gauss constant G is obtained till 10 places if mathematics of 'fun type' are used.)

3 comments:

Kirtivasan Ganesan said...

agm(25,27)/(agm(3,6,9)*(expr.)) gives G to 10 places.
expr. is 'fun type' expression.
expr. = (5.55 - 0.11) + 100/55555 + (100-15)(55)/(10000000000).
expr. contains only 0,1 and 5.
As I wrote it is 'fun type' expression.
And if we use this 'fun type' expression we get G as 0.8346268416.
agm(25,27) is 25.990380167016
agm(3,6,9) is 5.7223928514
expr. = 5.4418004855
So, this way or the other; by methods fair or unfair; at last got my master's (Gauss) constant G to 10 places.

Kirtivasan Ganesan said...

agm(9,10)/(agm(1,2,3,4,5)*(expr1.)) gives pi to 10 places.
expr1. is 'fun type' expression.
expr1. = 1+0.06666+(1+1)(0.00666)-((0.00066)/(1+1))-0.000066-((0.00000066)/(1+1)+0.0000066)-((0.0000000066)/(1+1)+0.000000066)+((1+1)^(6/(1+1))((0.0000000006666)/(1+1)+0.00000000066666)
expr1. contains only 0,1 and 6.
As I wrote it is 'fun type' expression.
And if we use this 'fun type' expression we get pi as 3.1415926536.
agm(9,10) is 9.4934153488641
agm(1,2,3,4,5) is 2.7991036626419
expr1.=1.0795770087
So, got pi to 10 places.

Kirtivasan Ganesan said...

I sincerely feel that there is 5% chance that some logic can be found out. For G and pi to 10 places.
Well agm(9,10)/agm(1,2,3,4,5) itself does not make sense. Can further logic make sense?
Maybe not. But then this is how history is made. You have 5% chance and one must go for it.
expr. for G has been obtained with 0,1 and 5. expr1. for pi has been obtained with 0,1 and 6.
There is a chance that one will stumble upon some sort of a scheme to make G and pi accurate.